Kinsley, Cincinnati, Ohio, John Herbison, Nashville, Tennessee, and Arvin H. Flowers, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the Appellee City of Chattanooga.
The primary issues on appeal concern whether the Chattanooga ordinance regulating adult oriented establishments provides the necessary procedural safeguards required by the First Amendment to be considered facially constitutional under the federal Constitution.
When firefighters arrived, they encountered heavy smoke outside the building and aggressively fought an interior blaze.
Police rerouted Rossville Boulevard traffic during the incident, opening the road when a majority of the firefighting vehicles departed after p.m.
MICHAEL SWINEY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which HERSCHEL P. Based on police reports detailing what the undercover officers observed at Cinema 1, the Mayor of Chattanooga revoked Franklin's adult oriented establishment license, a decision later affirmed by the Chattanooga City Council and then the Trial Court.“Preferred” listings, or those with featured website buttons, indicate YP advertisers who directly provide information about their businesses to help consumers make more informed buying decisions.YP advertisers receive higher placement in the default ordering of search results and may appear in sponsored listings on the top, side, or bottom of the search results page.We conclude the licensing scheme provides the necessary First Amendment procedural safeguards.We further conclude that there was sufficient evidence presented to revoke Franklin's license.